As you observed in the section introduction, commas should be used to set apart parenthetical expressions from the rest of the sentence, as in this sentence:
The staff was aware, through a written notice, that the Finance Department was conducting an audit of the direct payment procurement process.
One comma should precede a parenthetical expression, and another should follow it.
Thus far, we’ve covered general parenthetical expressions and their punctuation.
Now we are going to address a related issue involving commas: the difference between nonrestrictive clauses and restrictive clauses.
Remember the definition of a clause is: a group of words with a subject and a verb.
First, let’s explore nonrestrictive clauses. Like other parenthetical comments, nonrestrictive clauses add nonessential information to a sentence, such as in this example:
The chairman, who was elected by the board, determined that the policy violated the association’s bylaws.
The meaning of the sentence would not change if the clause who was elected by the board were omitted. The clause doesn’t restrict the meaning—hence, the term nonrestrictive clause.
And here is the relevance to punctuation: Nonrestrictive clauses are set off by commas. If the clause can be omitted, put commas around it.
Restrictive clauses, on the other hand, include essential information that restricts (limits) the noun that they refer to. The information in a restrictive clause is essential for the intended meaning of the sentence. For example:
The account executives who misrepresented the product’s safety record were dismissed.
The clause who misrepresented the product’s safety is essential to the meaning of the sentence because it limits the dismissal only to those account executives who misrepresented the product’s safety.
Here is another example of a restrictive clause:
The current system identifies nonimmigrants who have apparently overstayed their authorized period of admission.
The dependent clause above who have apparently overstayed their authorized period of admission [italics] restricts the meaning of nonimmigrants and distinguishes these nonimmigrants from others.
Note that restrictive clauses are NOT set off by commas.
To further emphasize the difference between nonrestrictive and restrictive clauses, consider the difference in meaning between:
Auditors, who use computers, make few mistakes.
Auditors who use computers make few mistakes.
In the first sentence, the clause is nonrestrictive (i.e., it doesn’t restrict the meaning of auditors). It’s stating that auditors make few mistakes and that auditors use computers.
In the second sentence, the clause is restrictive because it limits the word auditors to specific auditors—those who use computers. The sentence means specifically those auditors who use computers make few mistakes.
Nonrestrictive and restrictive clauses bring up the which/that grammatical controversy. Should a clause begin with “which” or “that?” Here are the rules.
Use “that” in restrictive clauses.
Use “which” in nonrestrictive clauses.
This sentence demonstrates the use of that in a restrictive clause:
The INS cannot realistically implement control mechanisms that provide the degree of precision required by the legislation.
This sentence demonstrates the use of which in a nonrestrictive clause:
If the military finance centers can now handle the volume of transactions, which could be as high as two million during a legislative adjustment, then the VA can easily accomplish necessary programming.
To summarize the differences between nonrestrictive and restrictive clauses:
Nonrestrictive = nonessential information, set off by commas, use which.
Restrictive = essential information, NOT set off by commas, use that.